germarockstar.blogg.se - Fsx vs x plane 10

#Fsx vs x plane 10 mac

The default scenery includes airport buildings (and some city buildings).With a lot of aftermarket plugins installed, the experience is untouchable by any other flight sim.There are no city or airport buildings included in the default scenery package.It’s summer 24/7/365 no matter where you fly in the world. While the default terrain is very nice, there is no winter or snow in the world of X-Plane.It’s still a young platform so aftermarket support is not as established as it is for FSX.Crude interface (this is being reworked, according to Laminar Research).New scenery and aircraft are being added all the time.Laminar research is heavily developing the platform and offers great support.

Add-on’s are easy to manage – just drag and drop into the main folder and it’s installed!.

It’s a very stable platform and crashes very rarely.

I use both X-Plane and FSX equally now, so I feel I’m well-qualified to do this X-Plane vs FSX comparison. Both have their pros and cons though, which are listed here: X-Plane pros: Comparison of X-Plane and FSX: Pros and Cons It took a lot of time to get everything added and installed but I now have a really great setup with FSX and it’s a pleasure to fly. The more I added, the better the experience became. However, it didn’t take long before I was adding more and more third-party extras to FSX ( REX essentials, GEX terrain, Aerosoft scenery, etc). At this point, I was pretty sure that Laminar Research had won the X-Plane 10 vs FSX battle. But remember, I’m not a real-world pilot, so that last point doesn’t carry much weight. It was difficult to navigate, the graphics were bland, and for whatever reason, I didn’t feel like the planes flew accurately – at least compared to X-Plane. Perhaps my expectations were too high, but I was not impressed the first time I loaded it up.

#Fsx vs x plane 10 mac

I really wanted to try it, so I broke down and installed Windows on a separate partition on my Mac (Bootcamp rocks), downloaded the service packs, and installed all the software. Several months passed, yet I still couldn’t stop thinking about FSX. On the ground at Chicago O’Hare with the default X-Plane 10 747-400 ( read my trip report from this FRA-ORD flight) It was my first flight sim experience and to say that I was blown away is putting it mildly. I do admit that I felt like I “settled” for a lesser flight simulator, but those feelings were washed away as soon as I installed it and started flying around. I am a Mac user however, so that pretty much was my only option even though I had heard great things about FSX. I started my flight sim journey with X-Plane 10 in May of this year, and believe me: I struggled a LOT trying to decide on X-Plane vs FSX.

Real-world functionality is indeed necessary, but it’s slightly lower on the list of priorities for me. I just want to fly around the world as visually realistic as I can and look at all the pretty scenery along the way. I’m not a pilot in real life, and I have no desire to become one so there is no burning desire for a hard-core sim experience. But that’s a topic for another post…Īnyway, I am the type of person who prefers visual realism over highly accurate systems and flight dynamics. Heck, even my landings are halfway decent! Except for my last landing at BCN where I got sloppy and overran the runway by a few hundred feet.

I try to follow procedure as closely as I can, but I’m still learning the in’s and out’s of complex SIDs and STARs, fuel and weight calculations, and other complex systems.Įven though I am still new to all this, I do know enough to fly around efficiently via basic GPS navigation and autopilot functions. Let me begin by saying that I consider myself to be an average (horrible) flight simmer, as opposed to a totally hard-core wannabe pilot who does everything by the book. Which is better? X-Plane 10 or FSX? X-Plane 10 vs FSX: My thoughts